Thursday, 30 April 2015

religion assumes too much about God. [ramble - draft thoughts that will feature within my book]

We find religious people, in general terms, assert a god by faith and from a gap logic, so from a belief in a book and interpretation, and the idea that a hole found within reality is a god shaped hole, so from the belief they hold and a place to build, they spin a belief that we know that a "god" is one who represents a Biblical God, or Koranic Allah.  The idea of a God is already slanted, from the faith position it is a question of confirmation bias, from the god must fit the bill position it's an extension, extended from the belief to include a potential for validity.  The result of confirming, for example, a first cause god, a creator, we are told utterly nothing about that creator by having the idea that he/she/it was somehow there, we are told nothing of it's will, desires, laws, orders, hopes, dreams, nor do we have any pointer towards any kind of religion, if any should be valid.  We are given, at best a series a mildly poor arguments by the faithful for why their must a be a god, they fail on their reliance on faith or upon selected definitions to assert by use of words a greater cause or force and mind to create the complex universe and all within, and even if this were true then what would it confirm in regards to any sect of Christianity?  What we find are assertions upon the foundational bad argument for a creator god, such as how many an apologist may make an unholy leap from infinite to god to the father god or trinity of the bible, the leap frogging between bias terms is a favourite of the faithful, because all they need is a thesaurus to find a series of related terms to take facts back to their version of god. 

Wednesday, 29 April 2015

How to become popular new age con artist? - example: Wild Colleen

sadly many gurus gets press via cheap tricks to get attention, one such person, Colleen had a series of softcore porn videos and images online, and some on youtube, to sell he reptilian conspiracy theories. 

she tried to put on a front, yet to gather FUNDS, she had pay for view nude videos on youtube, until they were reported, using nudity and conspiracies to get a following, and thousands in donations. 

 so some of her work was on conspiracies, illuminati, reptilians, angels, aliens, and much more, but she kept the sex side out there as a tool to gather attention. 

her angle was I have truth now, but if you want in you gotta pay!

so by early 2011 she was begging for cash, and saying you need this info to survive the alien invasion, and other such nonsense

 in the end she got over the nude pics, but went into a meltdown of conspiracy lies, even saying she was going to sue the illuminati members, but, guess what, donate now to fund this fake project. 

even claiming that the queen of england, UK prime minister, and US president, were going to be taken to court along with many others, she provides no paper trail to confirm this cash was send anywhere beyond her bank account. 

But in the end to stop being threatened by Christian Fundies she converted with a bang, but still NO REFUNDS. LOL. 

so she came out as a christian conspiracy nut, and after that she was forced to get a real job, return to administrating nurse role in a care home, this was due her fan base, her donation base drying up. 

this was not thanks to christians or new age groups online, it was thanks to those rational people who criticised her and her abuse of her following to pay all of her bills. 

action online can shut these frauds down, colleen is proof, as are many other can artists who have been exposed by concerned people. 

Teal Swan/scott/bosworth = former Pro-Model?

so she is a half nice looking girl, but so what?

the best modelling images seem to be cheap, amateurish, and suggestive, not a bad thing, but this is not kate moss. 

Teal makes many grand claims, not least the modelling, yet out of thousands of models she is just a nice looking woman, not one of the famous, not a well know face, and all she has in way of he career as a model are a few images, most of which semi-sexual, suggestive and poorly shot. 

If anything is evident it is she could make a nice model, but was/is not lightly to ever break through into world class modelling. 

If anything the sex in her work seems to benefit he new age belief far more than he career, yet in the long interview on youtube with a former follower the beans are spilled, she claimed she was into prostitution at one point, was she an escort at one point?  and he clients in healing are said to get extra services too. 

NOTE:  these things are opinions, not solid facts.  So don't sue me yet ;)

please look up this interview, very interesting, and teal even walks around the house nude and is ver much into free love, good for her. LOL.

Teal Swan is a fraud?

although I thought she was just a slightly nutty girl with a desire for power and fame, I now see she is far worse, a narcissistic cult leader in the making, with a status of guru, and already a small inner circle of devout followers.  this is best noted in an interview with a form Teal fan and a form Teal devotee, please watch this long interview.  

it's in a series of 5 videos, and is well worth a good look. 

remember that those who say they are goodness and peace, or love and light, are not as they may seem, they often reject the real, the human, the animal self, the things that we are not yet over, our weaknesses, our humanity, and so the fake spirituality and false enlightenment often manifest as domination and deception for personal power, not a greater unity of us all to a better world. 


Bad Science in the name of Spiritualism.

I have recently been tying to please the spiritualists by looking into the best science for their claims, I regret to inform you that your science is far from serious, and your results are bias, and as a result your not taken seriously by impartial experts. 

I made a few videos on a channel on youtube called GeneralSwartz, this channel is secondary to my RobertWLester channel, yet it's a place I talk about any topic I wish, so I I asked for their best evidence, and as a result made about 7 videos over a week, as well as two on the RobertWLester channel.  The results of internet investigation found that the most outspoken sights were religious or conspiracy theory sites, the worst being forums full of biases on such things as the scole experiments and marcello bacci, noting it "must be true" because of their experiences with mediums or due to documentary presentations that agree upon.  Their foundational reasoning is it's true, and here's the movie, here's the book, and it's sciency because we had tests, they ignore stories, documentaries, books, and tests are warped by biases, or poor test conditions with the so-called tests. 

note that no matter how much research I do I find no serious evidence, and the tests done by paranormalists are often made to gather results, not ensure true results, as with the scole experiment

this shame, this quackery display allowed many poor controls and no controls in a few cases, as with using a room in the mediums home to conduct a session, and they waved the right to confirm the room was OK for this test. 

the other example noted was in regard to Marcello Bacci, a chap who uses a radio to talk to the dead, it seems to be the Ghost box trick, or maybe a radio trick using a transmitters. 

in any case the tests run with Mr. Bacci were not run for confirmation of the ability as much as getting results with slack controls. 

one man who keeps pushing for lax controls is Mr. Victor Zammit, a spiritualist and lawyer, who has even insisted that James Randi should make the Million Dollar Challenge easier so mediums can pass it.  Victor is a man who like to think he is the answer to scepticism, and that mediums are real because in his tests they seem to offer results, yet in such cases he cuts out critical thought and leaves the "tests" open to trickery, such as hot and cold reading methods.  And he is the one saying that James Randi is a fraud, I think religion has poisoned his mind, and it can happen, just look at the writer of Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who was a genius as far as his famous work, yet fell prey to the power of religious thinking, and spent many years as a fund raiser, being hustled, by spiritualist conmen and believers alike. 


The Afterlife Experiments - BAD EVIDENCE FOR AN AFTERLIFE = the scole experiments

More bad science that can be explained away to a vast degree by trickery or just bad test controls.