We find religious people, in general terms, assert a god by faith and from a gap logic, so from a belief in a book and interpretation, and the idea that a hole found within reality is a god shaped hole, so from the belief they hold and a place to build, they spin a belief that we know that a "god" is one who represents a Biblical God, or Koranic Allah. The idea of a God is already slanted, from the faith position it is a question of confirmation bias, from the god must fit the bill position it's an extension, extended from the belief to include a potential for validity. The result of confirming, for example, a first cause god, a creator, we are told utterly nothing about that creator by having the idea that he/she/it was somehow there, we are told nothing of it's will, desires, laws, orders, hopes, dreams, nor do we have any pointer towards any kind of religion, if any should be valid. We are given, at best a series a mildly poor arguments by the faithful for why their must a be a god, they fail on their reliance on faith or upon selected definitions to assert by use of words a greater cause or force and mind to create the complex universe and all within, and even if this were true then what would it confirm in regards to any sect of Christianity? What we find are assertions upon the foundational bad argument for a creator god, such as how many an apologist may make an unholy leap from infinite to god to the father god or trinity of the bible, the leap frogging between bias terms is a favourite of the faithful, because all they need is a thesaurus to find a series of related terms to take facts back to their version of god.
Thursday, 30 April 2015
Wednesday, 29 April 2015
How to become popular new age con artist? - example: Wild Colleen
sadly many gurus gets press via cheap tricks to get attention, one such person, Colleen had a series of softcore porn videos and images online, and some on youtube, to sell he reptilian conspiracy theories.
she tried to put on a front, yet to gather FUNDS, she had pay for view nude videos on youtube, until they were reported, using nudity and conspiracies to get a following, and thousands in donations.
so some of her work was on conspiracies, illuminati, reptilians, angels, aliens, and much more, but she kept the sex side out there as a tool to gather attention.
her angle was I have truth now, but if you want in you gotta pay!
so by early 2011 she was begging for cash, and saying you need this info to survive the alien invasion, and other such nonsense
in the end she got over the nude pics, but went into a meltdown of conspiracy lies, even saying she was going to sue the illuminati members, but, guess what, donate now to fund this fake project.
even claiming that the queen of england, UK prime minister, and US president, were going to be taken to court along with many others, she provides no paper trail to confirm this cash was send anywhere beyond her bank account.
But in the end to stop being threatened by Christian Fundies she converted with a bang, but still NO REFUNDS. LOL.
so she came out as a christian conspiracy nut, and after that she was forced to get a real job, return to administrating nurse role in a care home, this was due her fan base, her donation base drying up.
this was not thanks to christians or new age groups online, it was thanks to those rational people who criticised her and her abuse of her following to pay all of her bills.
action online can shut these frauds down, colleen is proof, as are many other can artists who have been exposed by concerned people.
she tried to put on a front, yet to gather FUNDS, she had pay for view nude videos on youtube, until they were reported, using nudity and conspiracies to get a following, and thousands in donations.
so some of her work was on conspiracies, illuminati, reptilians, angels, aliens, and much more, but she kept the sex side out there as a tool to gather attention.
her angle was I have truth now, but if you want in you gotta pay!
so by early 2011 she was begging for cash, and saying you need this info to survive the alien invasion, and other such nonsense
even claiming that the queen of england, UK prime minister, and US president, were going to be taken to court along with many others, she provides no paper trail to confirm this cash was send anywhere beyond her bank account.
But in the end to stop being threatened by Christian Fundies she converted with a bang, but still NO REFUNDS. LOL.
so she came out as a christian conspiracy nut, and after that she was forced to get a real job, return to administrating nurse role in a care home, this was due her fan base, her donation base drying up.
this was not thanks to christians or new age groups online, it was thanks to those rational people who criticised her and her abuse of her following to pay all of her bills.
action online can shut these frauds down, colleen is proof, as are many other can artists who have been exposed by concerned people.
Teal Swan/scott/bosworth = former Pro-Model?
the best modelling images seem to be cheap, amateurish, and suggestive, not a bad thing, but this is not kate moss.
Teal makes many grand claims, not least the modelling, yet out of thousands of models she is just a nice looking woman, not one of the famous, not a well know face, and all she has in way of he career as a model are a few images, most of which semi-sexual, suggestive and poorly shot.
If anything is evident it is she could make a nice model, but was/is not lightly to ever break through into world class modelling.
If anything the sex in her work seems to benefit he new age belief far more than he career, yet in the long interview on youtube with a former follower the beans are spilled, she claimed she was into prostitution at one point, was she an escort at one point? and he clients in healing are said to get extra services too.
NOTE: these things are opinions, not solid facts. So don't sue me yet ;)
please look up this interview, very interesting, and teal even walks around the house nude and is ver much into free love, good for her. LOL.
Bad Science in the name of Spiritualism.
I have recently been tying to please the spiritualists by looking into the best science for their claims, I regret to inform you that your science is far from serious, and your results are bias, and as a result your not taken seriously by impartial experts.
I made a few videos on a channel on youtube called GeneralSwartz, this channel is secondary to my RobertWLester channel, yet it's a place I talk about any topic I wish, so I I asked for their best evidence, and as a result made about 7 videos over a week, as well as two on the RobertWLester channel. The results of internet investigation found that the most outspoken sights were religious or conspiracy theory sites, the worst being forums full of biases on such things as the scole experiments and marcello bacci, noting it "must be true" because of their experiences with mediums or due to documentary presentations that agree upon. Their foundational reasoning is it's true, and here's the movie, here's the book, and it's sciency because we had tests, they ignore stories, documentaries, books, and tests are warped by biases, or poor test conditions with the so-called tests.
note that no matter how much research I do I find no serious evidence, and the tests done by paranormalists are often made to gather results, not ensure true results, as with the scole experiment
this shame, this quackery display allowed many poor controls and no controls in a few cases, as with using a room in the mediums home to conduct a session, and they waved the right to confirm the room was OK for this test.
the other example noted was in regard to Marcello Bacci, a chap who uses a radio to talk to the dead, it seems to be the Ghost box trick, or maybe a radio trick using a transmitters.
in any case the tests run with Mr. Bacci were not run for confirmation of the ability as much as getting results with slack controls.
one man who keeps pushing for lax controls is Mr. Victor Zammit, a spiritualist and lawyer, who has even insisted that James Randi should make the Million Dollar Challenge easier so mediums can pass it. Victor is a man who like to think he is the answer to scepticism, and that mediums are real because in his tests they seem to offer results, yet in such cases he cuts out critical thought and leaves the "tests" open to trickery, such as hot and cold reading methods. And he is the one saying that James Randi is a fraud, I think religion has poisoned his mind, and it can happen, just look at the writer of Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who was a genius as far as his famous work, yet fell prey to the power of religious thinking, and spent many years as a fund raiser, being hustled, by spiritualist conmen and believers alike.
https://www.youtube.com/user/generalswartz/videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/robertwlester/videos
I made a few videos on a channel on youtube called GeneralSwartz, this channel is secondary to my RobertWLester channel, yet it's a place I talk about any topic I wish, so I I asked for their best evidence, and as a result made about 7 videos over a week, as well as two on the RobertWLester channel. The results of internet investigation found that the most outspoken sights were religious or conspiracy theory sites, the worst being forums full of biases on such things as the scole experiments and marcello bacci, noting it "must be true" because of their experiences with mediums or due to documentary presentations that agree upon. Their foundational reasoning is it's true, and here's the movie, here's the book, and it's sciency because we had tests, they ignore stories, documentaries, books, and tests are warped by biases, or poor test conditions with the so-called tests.
note that no matter how much research I do I find no serious evidence, and the tests done by paranormalists are often made to gather results, not ensure true results, as with the scole experiment
this shame, this quackery display allowed many poor controls and no controls in a few cases, as with using a room in the mediums home to conduct a session, and they waved the right to confirm the room was OK for this test.
the other example noted was in regard to Marcello Bacci, a chap who uses a radio to talk to the dead, it seems to be the Ghost box trick, or maybe a radio trick using a transmitters.
in any case the tests run with Mr. Bacci were not run for confirmation of the ability as much as getting results with slack controls.
one man who keeps pushing for lax controls is Mr. Victor Zammit, a spiritualist and lawyer, who has even insisted that James Randi should make the Million Dollar Challenge easier so mediums can pass it. Victor is a man who like to think he is the answer to scepticism, and that mediums are real because in his tests they seem to offer results, yet in such cases he cuts out critical thought and leaves the "tests" open to trickery, such as hot and cold reading methods. And he is the one saying that James Randi is a fraud, I think religion has poisoned his mind, and it can happen, just look at the writer of Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who was a genius as far as his famous work, yet fell prey to the power of religious thinking, and spent many years as a fund raiser, being hustled, by spiritualist conmen and believers alike.
https://www.youtube.com/user/generalswartz/videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/robertwlester/videos
Sunday, 1 March 2015
Hypno-Bullshit Wendi the pseudo-expert on "hypnotherapy"
[video's description]
[background audio is quiet in comparison to voice audio, excuse your shock ;)
and I also decided not to edit Penn & Teller clips into this video since it is easy enough for people to go watch the full episode on youtube or netfix or something]
Bullshit Hypnosis - Critical Review Of Wendi.com
Response to a woman called Wendi Friesen, who appeared on P&T Bullshit! - Hypnosis, and appeared on other tv shows a few times, she is one of a growing breed of pseudo-scientists. She is a hypnotherapist who creates CDs and downloads to do that which hypnotherapy just can't seem to do, but because she is making big money she is happy to advertise breast enlargement hypnosis, if you gotta a problem she would have an audio therapy session to help you, help you to give her a big income. In the Penn & Teller episode on hypnotherapy she said her site makes millions, and that show was made over 5 years ago, so how much money is she making now? [I dread to think!]. I chose to critique her works due to her lack of scientific standing and her radical claims, I'm sure she is a nice gal and yet I just can't let such quackery pass without serious criticism, it's not personal, it's just business. I find it interesting how her work covers everything you may need, the claim are great and yet a great deal of loose language means she is covered legally within alternative therapy, and still the great claims draw in millions of people and have made her quite rich.
I personally disagree with people who say they know anything that can't even half prove, and if they make a buck off a cancer victim to make a buck or play on human weaknesses that really annoys me, and that is what wendi does, not just prey on guys with tiny cocks.
she claims to be able to hypnotically cure cancer
http://www.wendi.com/html/cancer.html
and she has a guarantee, where basically she claims if you do what she says you'll get results, but if it's motivation then who needs hypno-bullshit?
http://www.wendi.com/html/guarantee.html
Testimonial page is interesting, and proves nothing, considering even Peter Popoff and Benny Hinn, as well as most quacks, have many testimonials.
http://www.wendi.com/html/testimonials.html
look for yourself, don't laugh too much ;)
http://www.wendi.com/
Wendi's Youtube channel, WendiFriesen (yes, she has a channel)
http://www.youtube.com/user/WendiFriesen
Penn & Teller's Bullshit! - Hypnosis (full episode)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_BM34ViAxk
Penn And Teller Website
http://www.pennandteller.com/
And Go Like The Penn And Teller Facebook Page
https://www.facebook.com/PennAndTeller
---
if anyone has any questions just ask, and if I can help then I will, or at least redirect you to a better informed guy.
---
also, what is fair use?
http://www.dmca.com/FAQ/Fair-Use
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
THANK YOU FOR REACHING THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE ;)
[background audio is quiet in comparison to voice audio, excuse your shock ;)
and I also decided not to edit Penn & Teller clips into this video since it is easy enough for people to go watch the full episode on youtube or netfix or something]
Bullshit Hypnosis - Critical Review Of Wendi.com
Response to a woman called Wendi Friesen, who appeared on P&T Bullshit! - Hypnosis, and appeared on other tv shows a few times, she is one of a growing breed of pseudo-scientists. She is a hypnotherapist who creates CDs and downloads to do that which hypnotherapy just can't seem to do, but because she is making big money she is happy to advertise breast enlargement hypnosis, if you gotta a problem she would have an audio therapy session to help you, help you to give her a big income. In the Penn & Teller episode on hypnotherapy she said her site makes millions, and that show was made over 5 years ago, so how much money is she making now? [I dread to think!]. I chose to critique her works due to her lack of scientific standing and her radical claims, I'm sure she is a nice gal and yet I just can't let such quackery pass without serious criticism, it's not personal, it's just business. I find it interesting how her work covers everything you may need, the claim are great and yet a great deal of loose language means she is covered legally within alternative therapy, and still the great claims draw in millions of people and have made her quite rich.
I personally disagree with people who say they know anything that can't even half prove, and if they make a buck off a cancer victim to make a buck or play on human weaknesses that really annoys me, and that is what wendi does, not just prey on guys with tiny cocks.
she claims to be able to hypnotically cure cancer
http://www.wendi.com/html/cancer.html
and she has a guarantee, where basically she claims if you do what she says you'll get results, but if it's motivation then who needs hypno-bullshit?
http://www.wendi.com/html/guarantee.html
Testimonial page is interesting, and proves nothing, considering even Peter Popoff and Benny Hinn, as well as most quacks, have many testimonials.
http://www.wendi.com/html/testimonials.html
look for yourself, don't laugh too much ;)
http://www.wendi.com/
Wendi's Youtube channel, WendiFriesen (yes, she has a channel)
http://www.youtube.com/user/WendiFriesen
Penn & Teller's Bullshit! - Hypnosis (full episode)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_BM34ViAxk
Penn And Teller Website
http://www.pennandteller.com/
And Go Like The Penn And Teller Facebook Page
https://www.facebook.com/PennAndTeller
---
if anyone has any questions just ask, and if I can help then I will, or at least redirect you to a better informed guy.
---
also, what is fair use?
http://www.dmca.com/FAQ/Fair-Use
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
THANK YOU FOR REACHING THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE ;)
[here ends the description]
response to a linked comment.
[the comment]
[my response to the comment]
a
comment left a day ago states 'let he who is without sin, cast the
first stone', firstly that story seems improbable to be historical, even
if it's meaning is moral. the stone cast by myself is to say of Wendi,
that her claims are false, or so far fetched as to be highly probable to
be so. As for my own 'whiter than white' aspect, I am not without
wrongs, past, present, and I would not doubt in my future, yet sin is a
construct invented by religion to enslave generations, feel free to
disagree. To say I must be 'without sin', 'whiter than white', to
'throw mud' is an odd idea, since no one person is perfect, or at least
it is highly improbable, and my going on are only my critique of such
money making pseudo-experts as Wendi and her quackery website. so, if
you please, consent to give humanity more credit, and indeed freedom, to
doubt the unreal and illogical, than to follow and remain faithful to
the peril of quackery and con-artistry. We need not be better or even
brighter than the people we ask questions of, nor do we need to stand as
the meek before all as the inheritors of the earth to call out an
untruth, for it is not a need to be pure to point out some obvious
errors. And I doubt that my audience, or at least most of them, think
that I would be unwilling to retract my points if show scientific
evidence of the claims of Wendi.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)