Thursday, 12 February 2015
Friday, 6 February 2015
Psychic testing project is delayed due to new job.
simply put i have a new job, and money is tight right now, so getting psychics to read that old box which I will claim as haunted is delayed, but I will return to the topic very soon.
I am nothing and no one?
A youtuber, Felinoid, came up with this, or at least the usage of it that I'm aware of, he may have hijacked or borrowed it, but it's the humble stance for a youtube vlogger.
How best to say something to the effect of 'I am not trying to own you or fuel my ego with this opinion'? Maybe, just maybe, we need a nice thing to say to put people at rest, then, when all that is done, we can start making clear points on a topic without baggage.
Offence, well it will forever come up, those who wish to take offence will regardless of the meekness of the vlogger responding to a point they wish to discuss.
To say 'I am nothing' is not to literal, it's a humble statement, to say 'and no one' continues the narrative, the point equals I am not here for myself, not for my goals, I am here to express a point from my own limited perspective. Maybe we should all have such honourable states of mind to our interactions, cutting free baggage, and the true discussions can take place.
How best to say something to the effect of 'I am not trying to own you or fuel my ego with this opinion'? Maybe, just maybe, we need a nice thing to say to put people at rest, then, when all that is done, we can start making clear points on a topic without baggage.
Offence, well it will forever come up, those who wish to take offence will regardless of the meekness of the vlogger responding to a point they wish to discuss.
To say 'I am nothing' is not to literal, it's a humble statement, to say 'and no one' continues the narrative, the point equals I am not here for myself, not for my goals, I am here to express a point from my own limited perspective. Maybe we should all have such honourable states of mind to our interactions, cutting free baggage, and the true discussions can take place.
Tuesday, 20 January 2015
Monday, 19 January 2015
AJ Miller Drone Fails!
AJ Miller drone fails!
this comment was left on a video where I was question why Aussie Jesus Guy, Alan John Miller, was recycling the beliefs of spiritualist from the era of the 1920s. He basically plagiarised James Padgett, a spiritualist writer from the 20s, and so is Alan John Miller the reincarnated Jesus or just a man who is mistaken?!
My point is he should be original and not just a guy ripping off the work of others.
comment location
https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=MQzd85YtZKA
Response to my comment was interesting, BUT note that he now has responded by saying Wikipedia is not accurate, and saying spiritualists don't count due to dogma, he may be partly correct, BUT, BUT!!! THE MORON DOESN'T SEEM TO GET THAT IT'S NOT JUST THEM, THOSE WERE EXAMPLES :) the truth is there is more history from various sources on the life and work of James Padgett, not just wiki fail and spiritualist fanatics. so he still fails. he also goes on to assume spiritualists are Christian, when many are not, in many spiritualist churches they have no bible and no Christian style to their operation, other than a kind of service system that isn't bound to Christianity, except in the case of Christian-spiritualist who do. So this guy is dodging the point that source point out facts that conflict with Alan Miller's new religion.
The end result opinion of the auusie Jesus is your meant to make him some kind of new age self-help hippy god, Why bloody well bother.
responses to AJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAJqeMteN3k
basically anyone being Jesus is probably bullshit!
this comment was left on a video where I was question why Aussie Jesus Guy, Alan John Miller, was recycling the beliefs of spiritualist from the era of the 1920s. He basically plagiarised James Padgett, a spiritualist writer from the 20s, and so is Alan John Miller the reincarnated Jesus or just a man who is mistaken?!
My point is he should be original and not just a guy ripping off the work of others.
comment location
https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=MQzd85YtZKA
Response to my comment was interesting, BUT note that he now has responded by saying Wikipedia is not accurate, and saying spiritualists don't count due to dogma, he may be partly correct, BUT, BUT!!! THE MORON DOESN'T SEEM TO GET THAT IT'S NOT JUST THEM, THOSE WERE EXAMPLES :) the truth is there is more history from various sources on the life and work of James Padgett, not just wiki fail and spiritualist fanatics. so he still fails. he also goes on to assume spiritualists are Christian, when many are not, in many spiritualist churches they have no bible and no Christian style to their operation, other than a kind of service system that isn't bound to Christianity, except in the case of Christian-spiritualist who do. So this guy is dodging the point that source point out facts that conflict with Alan Miller's new religion.
The end result opinion of the auusie Jesus is your meant to make him some kind of new age self-help hippy god, Why bloody well bother.
responses to AJ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAJqeMteN3k
basically anyone being Jesus is probably bullshit!
Thursday, 15 January 2015
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)